5 Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 Reputation. ) Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Department 425 11 ) ) 5 are-san francisco no. Code 3294. was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. 1.2 and United States Code 5 U.S.C. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) The court decides these applications without a hearing. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 Here, Plaintiffs have extensively alleged what they contend constitutes malice. See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. 9:11-13.) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 You may also call or email the department. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM SRMH argues the following causes of action should not be allowed to proceed because Plaintiff fails to state facts sufficient to support the causes of action: (2) Negligence; (3) Violation of EMTALA Statute; (4) Personal Injury; (5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Wage Loss; (8) Loss of Earning Capacity; (9) Negligent Supervision; (10) Possible Diminution of Life Span; and (11) Punitive Damages. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. 11 ) 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 ) Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). ) 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 Attn: Appellate Court Services. ) (415) 551-3759, Court Manager 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. ) 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 5 A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . 11 ) The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. ) The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. ) ) The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RECONSIDERATION OF 1 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) Defendant moves the Court to set aside his default. ) 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 ) 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) 5 Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. Legal advertisement. Board of Med. 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 The motion was rejected by San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer on December 30, 2022. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. File the original motion and proof of service with the court. The court must not require any other form of citation. 11 ) Defendants motion to set aside default under CCP 473(d) is GRANTED to the degree it names Defendant as an individual. ) ) ) 5 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. ) CCP 1292.2. Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . ) 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. File & ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. . ) ) These departments may go under different names in different counties. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9:1-3.). ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA CCP 2031.240(c)(1). ) ) The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). "A person desiring to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified application together with proof of service by mail.". 11 ) reserve a hearing date with the applicable department. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits and [i]f an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it shall be answered to the extent possible. CCP 2030.220(a)-(b). 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 Department rules are available here. ) Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. (415) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) ) ) 5 A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. 9 MARCUS C HOPKINS, ) Department: 403 Plaintiff seeks $1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 ) 11 ) ) ) However, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. See Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 (actions falling below the professional standard of care is not excusable neglect as defined under CCP 473(b)). The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. ) ) 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. ) Filter by a specific county without spaces. ) Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). ) 11 ) Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. ) Phone: 415-705-1033 ) (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). Plaintiffs shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). ) 12 REVIEW HEARING RE; PARENTING TIME The court DENIES the motion. This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. ) Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. ) (CCP) 473 (d) to set aside the default. 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 7:4-5; 6:7-9). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 WYNTER HICKS, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816138 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 11 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORTS AND REVIE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 11 ) ) 11 ) However, merely pleading that a defendant was intoxicated at the time of the accident, without something more, is not alone adequate basis for punitive damages. 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. MORE Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. Judges often set a motion cut-off date or deadline. CCP . ) 11 ) It is worth noting that Defendants reply asserting this point was also late, filed only four court days prior to hearing. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. The application must state reasons why the argument cannot be made within the stated limit. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Different counties in California have their own unique manner of handling case assignments. (3) Upon the request of a party to the action, any party citing any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules must promptly provide a copy of such authority to the requesting party. I like all the marble too. ) (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. 6 JENNIFER PUENTE, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792728 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) ) 5 This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. Com. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) ) See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. Instead they must show a compelling and opposing state interest. Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 239 [disapproved on other grounds by Williams v. Sup. Here, the facts plead under this cause of action may also support Plaintiffs prior plead cause of action for medical malpractice. South San Francisco, CA 94080 . The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. ) 5 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Time of Hearing. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Allen v. Sup.Ct. ) ) The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) To the extent practicable, all supporting memorandums and declarations must be attached to the notice of motion. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEAL UNREDACTED RESPONSIVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CRC 3.1203(a) (amended eff 1/1/08).When notice of an ex parte application is given, the person giving . 11 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ***, Collections Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Family Law Covid-19 Information and Update, Jury Services Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Traffic Division COVID-19 Information & Update, Previous Orders, Notices & Press Releases By Year, https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85708488569?pwd=MzAvL3o3U2g4ck5SZTN3cXEyNllOQT09. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 6 SUNGHEE PARK CHUNG, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772628 ) On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from San Francisco County Superior. By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. Dept22@sanmateocourt.org. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. In its amended notice of demurrer and demurrer to Plaintiffs complaint, SRMH demurs to Plaintiffs eleventh cause of action for Punitive Damages, however, the court notes this request is not addressed in its amended memorandum of points and authorities filed therewith.
Disadvantages Of Connectionism Theory,
Is Hunter Doohan Related To James Doohan,
Commission Scolaire Des Navigateurs Taxes,
Articles S